The Editors then make a decision based on the Reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities: (a) Accept, with or without editorial revisions (b) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached (c) Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission (d) Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Internet Explorer). Use one name throughout and include any others at first mention: 'Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1)'. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. Avoid listing multiple names of genes (or proteins) separated by a slash, as in 'Oct4/Pou5f1', as this is ambiguous (it could mean a ratio, a complex, alternative names or different subunits). These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. As part of Nature Portfolio, npj Clean Water follows common policies as detailed via the menu on the left that our authors and prospective authors must follow. Ranges are more appropriate than standard deviations or standard errors for small data sets. If this is not possible in a combined manuscript file, authors should either submit separate high resolution figure files or deposit image data in a suitable repository (e.g. The resubmitted manuscript may be sent back to the original referees or to new referees, at the Editors' discretion. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. When creating and submitting digital files, please follow the guidelines below. Comprehensive information on the statistical analyses used must be included in the paper. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. ICP14018916-1 Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Send to Copyediting: This means the submission is . Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Isolated mass and percent yields should be reported at the end of each protocol. At this point the status of your article will change to 'Completed' and no further modifications can be made in Editorial Manager. Should your manuscript be accepted, you will receive more extensive instructions for final submission of display items. . If the authors ask the Editors to consider the previous reviews, they should include a note explaining the relationship between the submitted manuscript and the previous submission and (assuming it has been revised in light of the referees' criticisms) give a point-by-point response to the referees. The npj Series journals use standard Nature referencing style. Thank you for visiting nature.com. All Rights Reserved. 0, 80 If the manuscript does not match the scope of the journal or does not meet the standards of the journal, it will be returned without review. It is also appropriate to include suggested or excluded referees in the cover letter. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. 2002 Authors must state whether a number that follows the sign is a standard error (s.e.m.) Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. either in the manuscript text, supplementary information, or the Methods section, as appropriate. The page will refresh upon submission. or a standard deviation (s.d.). Follow this link for further information on the review process and how Editors make decisions. Every article that contains statistical testing should state the name of the statistical test, the n value for each statistical analysis, the comparisons of interest, a justification for the use of that test (including, for example, a discussion of the normality of the data when the test is appropriate only for normal data), the alpha level for all tests, whether the tests were one-tailed or two-tailed, and the actual P value for each test (not merely "significant" or "P < 0.05"). 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2 DavidUCSDfacetime50"f**king awesome" Figures should be numbered separately with Arabic numerals in the order of occurrence in the text of the manuscript. Miami-Dade County - 11th Circuit Court, Florida . For all studies using custom code that is deemed central to the conclusions, a statement must be included in the Methods section, under the heading "Code availability", indicating whether and how the code can be accessed, including any restrictions. Grant details and acknowledgments are not permitted as numbered references. NPJ PARKINSONS DIS . SCIWaiting to Send Decision to Author, @12:21ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @5:, , @13:ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @16:, Geotechnical Engineeng With Assessor, SCIreviewNot Assigned, SCIreviewers assigend, , Eupean Polymer Journal with editor, sciunder review reviews invited, worduse 2007 or later version, mateals letters 3Required Reviews Completed. When the Editors begin to enter a decision it will move the status to 'Decision in Process'. | npj Precision Oncology. We can accept LaTeX files at the acceptance stage, but before then please supply compiled PDFs. Unusual units or abbreviations should be spelled out in full or defined in the legend. Acknowledgements should be brief, and should not include thanks to anonymous Reviewersand Editors, or effusive comments. Resubmit for Review: This will require the Author to make major changes and another round of review will need to take place.. To obtain 0, :1.0 | :25.02021/08/16 Manuscript ReceivedEditor AssignedManuscript Under Consideration2021/08/24 Associate Editor assigned2021/08/27 Manuscript Under Consideration2021/09/01 Waiting to Send Decision to Author2021/09/02 Editorial decision: Reject before peer review, 95 on 22 Dec, 2017, Answered by Radhika Shridhar Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. Use of the rainbow color scale should be avoided. Ideally no more than two resubmissions will be considered for each manuscript, following which we will try to reach a final decision on publication. An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. | The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. Bellin, D. L. et al. Authors will see a proof that will include figures. Units should have a single space between the number and the unit, and follow SI nomenclature (for example, ms rather than msec) or the nomenclature common to a particular field. Serum Response . If you have figures or tables prepared, include them with your appeal letter. The length of time this stage takes does not affect the decision in any way, it's neither a good nor a bad sign. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision Am. Please note that the use of any editing service is at the author's own expense and in no way implies that the article will be selected for peer review or accepted for publication. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. | Author CD declares no financial competing interests. Waiting to Send Decision to Author9 . Scale bars should be used rather than magnification factors, with the length of the bar defined. Normal distribution: Many statistical tests require that the data be approximately normally distributed; when using these tests, authors should explain how they tested their data for normality. 31010402000380, , editor@medsci.cn. To do this, the corresponding author will need to: Submission to npj Precision Oncology is taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration or in press elsewhere. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria. The underlying code for this study [and training/validation datasets] is not publicly available but may be made available to qualified researchers on reasonable request from the corresponding author. Is long period a good or bad sign? Please enter your feedback to submit this form, Journal Article Publishing Support Center. Figure lettering should be in a clear, sans-serif typeface (for example, Helvetica); the same typeface in the same font size should be used for all figures in a paper. When selecting Reviewers, we seek to avoid conflicts of interest and close associates of the authors. Thus, we ask authors to recolor green-and-red heatmaps, graphs and schematics for which colours are chosen arbitrarily. (1), 147-153. figshare http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.853801 (2014). Electrochemical camera chip for simultaneous imaging of multiple metabolites in biofilms. Small sample size: When the sample size is small (less than about 10), authors should use tests appropriate to small samples or justify their use of large-sample tests. Lettering in figures should be in lower-case type, with only the first letter of each label capitalized. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores ( ScholarOne ), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Manuscripts published in the npj Series journals are not subject to in-depth copy editing or display item redrawing as part of the production process. In particular, when you submit a . Springer Nature is committed to diversity, equity and inclusion; Nature Portfolio journals strive for diverse demographic representation of Peer-Reviewers. All manuscripts must be submitted via our online submission system using theSubmit manuscript link. Is it a bad sign if the status shows "Ready for Decision" for a long time? If the authors have successfully addressed all the comments of the Reviewers and the Editors, the Editors will deem the paper acceptable for publication in npj Vaccines. An invited revision should be submitted via the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter, not as a new manuscript. | AbstractThe identification of molecular targets of bioactive food components is important to understand the mechanistic aspect of their physiological functions. [CDATA[> , 2016513. We strive to ensure that the diversity of our Reviewers reflects that of the broad scientific community, in terms of gender, ethnicity/race, geographic location and career stage. Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets may be included in the reference list. Chem, 2016, 1 (1), 147-153. For more information about the npj Series and a list of journals, see https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/about/npj-series. | Published papers: Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to publish any figures or illustrations that are protected by copyright, including figures published elsewhere and pictures taken by professional photographers. Figures divided into parts should be labeled with a lower-case bold a, b, and so on, in the same type size as used elsewhere in the figure. The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". The Methods section should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific subsections for statistics, reagents and animal models.